Direction: In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong'argument and a 'weak' argument. A ' strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I and II and III. You have to decide which of the argument is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
-
Statement
Should 'literacy' be the minimum criterion for becoming a voter in India?
Arguments
I.No, mere literacy is no guarantee of political maturity of an individual.
II. Yes , illiteracy people are less likely to make politically wiser decisions of voting for a right candidate or party.
III.No, voting is the constitutional right of every citizen.
-
- None is stong
- I and III are strong
- III is strong
- II and III are strong
- All are strong
Correct Option: E
It cannot be said that is literate person has all round knowledge of politics. So, Argument I is strong. IIIiterate person can easily be misled on various factors but voting is also a constitutional right of every citizen. So, Arguments II and III are also strong.
